Civil Discourse Forum on School Bond

The proposed school bond on this April’s ballot has inspired passionate response among both supporters and opponents. Other islanders are undecided and feel they need more information before casting their ballots.

By Michele Heller

The proposed school bond on this April’s ballot has inspired passionate response among both supporters and opponents. Other islanders are undecided and feel they need more information before casting their ballots.

All will have an opportunity to express their views and ask questions at a public forum this Thursday, April 4, 6 – 8 p.m. at the Community Center in a setting that welcomes and respects the full spectrum of views.

The forum will be based on the concept of “‘Civil Discourse,” which offers participants the opportunity to explain the reasons behind their opinions and to listen carefully to understand opposing views.

This discourse supports the public good and helps build solidarity even among those who continue to disagree. It promotes the ability to evaluate factual information.

The format includes a moderator, Lorrie Harrison, who is trained in communication that promotes compassionate listening and respectful dialogue. Harrison is neutral on the bond.

“Everyone wants to be heard, to have their opinion considered, to be part of an outcome they can support,” says Harrison, who will be intent on creating an atmosphere of safety where all views are heard and honored.

One goal of the forum is to explore and find common ground, to hear and respond to each other and, whatever the outcome of the vote, to continue working together. Creating a strong school for our children is a goal upon which all agree.

At the heart of the bond question are issues of scope, quality and financing of the school renovation. A primary goal of the Forum is for voters to access and evaluate the facts.

Civil discourse has been described by Kenneth J. Gergen as “the language of dispassionate objectivity,” which neither diminishes the other’s moral worth nor questions their good judgment. It avoids hostility, direct antagonism or excessive persuasion.

What is the silver lining? “When we cast the net wide, when we gather the most diverse views, we also create the environment for the strongest community solutions,” says Harrison.