News: Local jobless rate drops to 3.5 percent


June 17, 2008 · Updated 11:15 AM 

  • 0
  • Print Story
  • Letter/Editor

San Juan County’s unemployment rate for June was 3.5 percent, the third lowest in the state after Garfield (3.4) and Whitman (2.9).

In June, San Juan County had a labor force of 7,400 people, of which 7,140 were employed and 260 were jobless, the state Employment Security Department reported.

That’s a drop of .04 percent from May. In May, San Juan County had a labor force of 6,900 people, of which 6,620 were employed and 270 were jobless — an unemployment rate of 3.9 percent.

In June 2002, San Juan County had a labor force of 7,240, of which 6,970 were employed and 260 were unemployed, a rate of 3.6 percent.

Statewide, the jobless rate gained three-tenths of a percentage point to reach 7.7 percent, Employment Security Commissioner Sylvia P. Mundy said. The nation's seasonally adjusted unemployment rate also rose three-tenths of a percentage point to 6.4 percent.

"The state's unemployment rate has reached its highest level since April 2002," Mundy said. "This news is in contrast to other signs that the economy is beginning to strengthen. The rise in the unemployment rate, adjusted for normal seasonal variation, was caused by a decrease in current employment rather than an increase in job seekers.

"While some sectors are showing signs of recovery, businesses overall are not yet convinced that demand will be sufficient to justify hiring."

Washington's nonagricultural wage and salary employment rose by 11,000 jobs in June — an increase of 0.4 percent. Although there were continued slight declines in aerospace (-700), the bulk of job losses occurred in normal seasonal layoffs in both public and private education over the month. Private educational services lost 3,600 jobs, state education lost 3,900 jobs, and local education lost 300. The rest of local government also took a hit, declining by 1,700 jobs over the month.

Normal seasonal gains continued in construction (3,200), retail trade (1,700), transportation and warehousing (1,000), and leisure and hospitality (6,000). There was also a slight uptick in sectors that serve businesses with information up 1,000, financial activities up 900, and professional and business services up 1,400 jobs.

Washington's year-over-year change in nonagricultural employment was almost nil, rising by only 300 jobs since June 2002. There still remain, however, significant gainers and losers over the year. Manufacturing accounts for the vast majority of job losses, down 20,700 since June 2002. The transportation, warehousing, and utilities sector is also down from last year with 2,100 fewer jobs.

Other sectors show very little over-the-year change. Those sectors posting a less-than-1-percent change in jobs include wholesale trade (+800 jobs, 0.7 percent), retail trade (+1,000 jobs, 0.3 percent), information (-500 jobs, 0.5 percent), professional and business services (+1,800 jobs, 0.6 percent), and government (+4,200 jobs, 0.8 percent).

Sectors showing some significant strength over last year include construction (+1,900 jobs, 1.2 percent), financial activities (+2,700 jobs, 1.9 percent), education and health services (+7,500 jobs, 2.4 percent), and leisure and hospitality (+2,900 jobs, 1.1 percent). More than three-quarters of the increase in government over the year is accounted for by job increases in education. There are also slight increases in federal and other local government employment.

Comment on this story.

COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in our online community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. In a nutshell, don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read.

So keep your comments:

  • Civil
  • Smart
  • On-topic
  • Free of profanity

We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters. We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

blog comments powered by Disqus